For those interested in the projected change of the Duke of York’s School in September 2010 to ‘academy status’, a visit to the article dealing with this subject in detail is to be found in the index of the Duke of York’s School (see main page of the www.achart.ca website).
Comment 28 May 2010
First, I admire the tour de force that Art and Ben have produced, which I hope all may read. My comments stem from a careful reading. First, I was aware of the MoD’s desire to reduce its investment as far back as the early 1980s, when a management consultant friend was retained to ascertain if parents would pay fees. To get to the point, however, the question is ‘what is the future of DYRMS per se with respect to its history and culture or not’ as admirably explained in the paper?
My next question, is academy status a done deal as of this autumn or is something to be worked towards? I have some lateral experience of this world, having just shifted a London out of school music training provision (set up for the ‘have nots’) into what are called ‘new arrangements.’ External funding (sponsorship) is vital, but that is the second step only. The first is the determination of the governing body and leadership team. Do we know their vision/plan?
Academy deals are more swiftly achieved when the relinquishing authority is part of the process; not in divesting itself of responsibility, but in helping advance the process and, if necessary, granting a dowry to assure a smooth transition. There are also issues of TUPE transfer of staff to be managed. For example, Westminster Borough Council having an institution they wanted to achieve academy status, they had to be involved and to provide dowry funding. It’s an unwise management that allows itself to be liberated from parental control/(in this case MoD) without first having clear direction.
As to the mission of the school, A continuing military culture is important, but the military influence has changed and future independence may well change that character more. According to the record, its results are decent but do not compete with the top echelon. From FT surveys, the DYS scored well for value for money but was not academically excellent. Will the school have had its day if it becomes independent? It certainly needs a strong pitch and strong leadership to counter that.
In terms of the role of alumni (here I draw on tyro years spent fundraising) the top independents lean heavily on wealthy current parents and a combination of wealthy alumni (for large donations) and the not so wealthy for more modest support. We might think the social background of our alumni does not dispose us to contribute generously, for we may not appear to be acculturated as the alumni of the top independents are, but this has to be tested.
The redbrick and newer universities face the same problem, although some are successful in fundraising. In the Oxbridge context, my old college, St Catherine’s, very much of 60s foundation, does well to get 15-20% alumnus support but the vast majority are average givers, i.e. £500 a year averaged out would put you in the middle/upper ranks of those that do give. Yes, we do have a very few large donors, but we are not Balliol/Christchurch.
In sum: 1. What is the school’s continuing effective mission? 2. How strongly/committed is the board management and its vision? 3. What role is the departing parent/funder (MoD) playing in making a new world possible?
Chris
Comment 1 July 2010
Academy has been used in Scotland for some decades. Our previous government peppered with socialist Scots would have imported it.
Colin