Duke of York’s Academy

February 8th, 2010

By way of the grapevine, I have come into possession of the DND 1997 promo video of the Duke of York’s School, produced for the information of parents in the Armed Services who are looking for a residential school in which to enrol their child or children. The video is well-produced, cut and presented. I recommend Its viewing to all ex-Dukies, but particularly those of some generations back who knew as a military institution. The reason is that the changes that have taken place with the addition of buildings, amenities for co-educational tutoring, and a curriculum to prepare students for university are remarkable.

A viewing makes anyone proud to have been associated with the School. Some, who might yearn for the good old days, will not be impressed. This will be especially so for those who view the video with a sense of wistfulness for the way things were during their time. Parents of the present generation of potential students will be impressed because the Duke of York’s has been transformed into the very model of a modern public school, one that compares favourably with the finest co-educational teaching institution in the country.

Following an impressive series or aerial shots, Headmaster Gordon Wilson has a few interesting comments. Scenes of a typical day in a student’s life, of the first-rate catering, sports, accommodation, and extra-curricular activities are well-balanced for interesting viewing. The commentaries of some students, boys and girls, follow a voice-over narration during which, regrettably, there is excessive reference to ‘facilities’ that makes one’s toes curl. The remarks offered by members of staff are well-chosen and worth hearing.

The school uniform for boys and girls is smart, attractive and casual. Blue blazer, grey flannel trousers for the boys and blue skirts for the girls, and casually-worn school scarves, trim white shirts and school ties are in sharp contrast with the coarse khaki uniforms, short trousers and ammunition boots of the past. The change is a welcome sight to this former student.

This excellent video shows a school that will create a much greater all round self-confidence in the pupils never achieved in the past. The adjustments previous generations had to make when they left the closeted existence of what was a military kindergarten were traumatic and harrowing. The school is no longer a military institution, nor is it any more royal than Eton, Harrow, Wellington or any other public school. It is therefore fitting that it be renamed the Duke of York’s Academy.

Riding the VIA’s Continental looking for a girl with dark hair

January 26th, 2010

The ‘Orient Express’ is no match for the service, elegant dining and comfort of VIA Rail’s ‘Continental’ from Toronto to Vancouver. Not the Eurostar with its flashy style and high speed nor the Trans Mongolian Express for sheer distance nor the efficiency of Japan Rail can compare with VIA’s Continental. As for excitement, ‘The Polar Express’ has to go a long way to beat the Continental.

Leaving Edmonton in the early hours of day, travelling to Vancouver to spend Christmas and New Year with my daughter, Kate, the carriage attendant delivers a note in unfamiliar handwriting. It reads: Mr. Cockerill: There is a surprise for you on the train. Look for the girl with dark hair.

‘Where is this girl with the dark hair?’ I ask. The attendant cannot tell; he doesn’t know. As it is the breakfast hour, I enter the dining car and decline a seat with three other diners because I spy, at the far end of the carriage, the seated rear view of a young woman with dark hair. She is alone and might have written the message, so I pass between the diners clutching the note in my fist to question her. I cough a slight cough to attract her attention.

She turns, her face wreathed in a delicious smile. No! It is more than that. She has the fabulous grin of the Cheshire Cat. Eyes glistening with delight, she flings her arms about me and says, ‘Hello, Dad.’

She is Kate, who flew to Edmonton the night before and, with VIA Rail’s collusion and connivance, boarded the train undetected. She had her note delivered by the stone-faced attendant who was in her confidence. Her surprise is complete – and so is my day.

Abuse of power or the exercise of it?

January 25th, 2010

Opposition to Prime Minister Harper’s action in proroguing parliament not once, but twice during the present term of this minority government is understandable. The PM is accused of thwarting the will of the people for his own wicked political ends, which is infuriating, exasperating, irritating – or so the opposition and many editorial writers would have us believe, but is it unlawful? No, it is not.

Prime Ministers in previous parliaments have done the same thing, always for iniquitous political reasons, according to those who oppose them. The history of the British parliamentary system is stuffed with occasions when the government of the day shut down parliament. The practice goes back to beyond Cromwell and Monke to those scheming monarchs who would have it their way.

The opposition may be right by their own lights to slag off the government for its unsporting behaviour. It might be disreputable, mean-spirited and disgraceful, but it is neither unlawful nor dishonest. The PM is within his rights to shut down parliament to suit his agenda. If in power, those parties presently in opposition would do, and some have done, the same thing when it suited them.

Facebook opposition is quoted as evidence of dissent. It has reached a whopping 200,000 plus names, which is a paltry number. Given the population of Canada of around 30 million, that figure makes less than one per cent (0.67 per cent to be more precise).

The turn-out at rallies in Toronto, Ottawa, Vancouver, Halifax et al (even Cobourg mustered a showing) totalling 20,000 at the most hardly constitutes a groundswell. Adding that number to those registering their opposition on Facebook, the percentage is still less than 1 per cent of the total population.

So opposition hype to prorogation amounts to little more than a gripe. Until parliament finds a legitimate way of putting a stop to the practice of shutting down the House, prime ministers will exercise their will to suit themselves. Amen

I’m leaving. What about you?

January 25th, 2010

Enough time has passed to give the CBC’s revamped news presentation fair and careful viewing. The conclusion, it is found wanting.

For clarity’s sake if for no other reason, news reports should be plain, straight-forward and unadorned. Instead, in the new format the viewer is faced with a screen cluttered with subsidiary messages, duplicate images and distracting graphics. A battery of graphic blocks includes the prominent CBC tv logo, a second rectangle with a distracting rolling colour, and a message to remind the viewer that this is the news show; not programme, show mind. These graphics sit on what one takes to be weather information, yet unreadable. Beneath this is a rolling message, also too small for easy reading while, behind the presenter, a larger, constantly changing graphic tells the viewer this is the CBC news.

Really! This is more than overkill. It is dumb, dumb, dumb. Talk about multi-tasking; the viewer needs a doctorate in split-concentration for comprehension
Normal news viewing is a pathetic experience enough, but facing the Power & Politics show is an ordeal of endurance calling for fortitude and patience. Hosted by an aggressive presenter competing with the same battery of puerile graphics that characterize news show requires stamina. More depressing is the journalist’s raucous competition with those he interviews; boastingly called the ‘power panel’.

It appears more than the presenter can bear to ask a question and listen to the answer, but insists on automatically mouthing his own opinion. From where did the CBC draw its latest generation of journalists? What is CBC tv sinking to if not into a quagmire of despair?

I’ll turn to CTV for the news. What about you?

Cobourg suffers a plague of bollards

January 20th, 2010

Pavement bollards at Royal Hospital, Belfast

This photograph showing bollards installed on the pavement of the Royal Hospital, Belfast, to prevent nurses from parking their vehicles reminds one of the plague of bollards that infests the Town of Cobourg. One wonders how long it was before the workmen in Belfast realized how they were to get home.  

Cobourg owes its pestilence to an over-enthusiastic council with more money than sense. Bollards of the same design and appearance as those in the illustration are installed throughout Cobourg, overrunning the side streets, back streets, main traffic arteries. They are anchored at intervals to lumps, bumps and projections from the sidewalks into the roadway and superciliously referred to as ‘traffic calming’ devices.

Traffic calming may be the clever intent of the Works Department, but they are hazardous to drivers and induce in them a fury of frustration. As a result, calming traffic is the last thing bollards do. To Town bus drivers and tractor trailer operators making deliveries they are pestilential nuisances that add to the perils of negotiating tight corners and parking.

Bollard sales representatives have done a sterling job of selling these monstrosities, for they crowd the thoroughfares of North America and Europe alike. There is no stopping their spread.

A letter to the local rag referring to ‘those bollards on council’ was rejected, one presumes, for the perceived obscene insinuation regarding their parentage when all one meant was they had the same brainless imagination as bollards.

Cobourg and the Highway of Heroes

January 18th, 2010

For many months now, the Town of Cobourg, Ontario, has honoured fallen servicemen and women flown from Afghanistan to the RCAF airbase at Trenton. Following  most solemn ceremony, they are then transported to Toronto for return to their families for burial.

Fire trucks from communities along the Province’s main 401 highway, join the flag-bearing spectators who congregate on the overpasses to honour the dead and to witness the motorcade from Trenton pass by. The stretch of highway from Trenton to Toronto was recently renamed the ‘Highway of Heroes’.       

To honour the fallen is commendable, laudable and entirely fitting. This gesture of respect goes back to the most ancient of civilisations and is one to be endorsed and deeply respected in our society.

Anyone venturing censure to the mildest degree the homage paid to the fallen does so at their peril. This said, I find aspects of the panoply of these ceremonials disconcerting. As a soldier with eight years  service (1943-1951), I find nothing heroic in being blown up by a bomb or shot by an unseen enemy. That is what soldiers risk.

This is not to disparage, ridicule or denigrate those who die doing their duty. Soldiering is a dangerous profession and those who operate at the sharp edge of battle risk death or serious injury by one means or another. Our concern should be for the wounded, the maimed and the injured, for they are of this world and the dead are not. The wounded and traumatised need all the nation’s medical and  therapeutic resources put at their disposal and, when they are healed or sufficiently recovered, they need after care and attention, often for the rest of their lives. It is society’s job to make sure they get it.

Let us be all means honour the dead, but know, too, that they died doing what they were trained to do. That does not make them heroes. That stretch of highway is by all that is just and right the ‘Highway of Warriors’, but not, I am bound to say the ‘Highway of Heroes’.  We should reserve the word hero  for those who perform deeds of heroism beyond the path of duty.

DYRMS Academy

January 18th, 2010

As of September 2010, the Department of Defence proposes to change the Duke of York’s Royal Military School into an academy within the mainstream state-funded section. A ‘consultation questionnaire’ is circulating to garner opinion even though the change is inevitable.

Significantly, circulation is to the Armed Forces, students, parents, members of the teaching and support staff, and Commissioners of the School. Almost as an afterthought, there is space for anyone  ‘… else with an interest in the proposal’. Courtesy of the OBA, the questionnaire has been distributed to OBA members.

The ‘working title’ of the new academy is Duke of York’s Royal Military School – An Academy with Military Traditions. The first statement deals with the title of the new Academy; comments or optional names for the institution are invited.

I have written elsewhere that management and operation of the School is no business of its alumni. Nevertheless, considering the changed status of the School (or Academy, but not both) means that it will no longer be ‘royal’ or ‘military’. It is just another ‘public school’ although one that caters to children of the Armed Forces.

One would not attach the ‘royal’ to Eton, Harrow, Wellington, Ampleforth or Charterhouse to mention some notable public schools. What justification is there then for attaching ‘royal’ to the Duke of York’s? As for the word ‘military’ that, in the context of the School’s function and raison d’être, no longer applies either. It is a fee-paying institution and totally transformed from its original purpose.

In short, Duke of York’s School – An Academy with Military Traditions, is enough. Let there the matter rest.

Art’s new blog

January 17th, 2010

Welcome.  More will be coming.